Dr Nyaho Nyaho-Tamakloe, a key plaintiff in the case challenging the delegate system employed by political parties, has described the recent Supreme Court ruling as a landmark victory for Ghana’s democracy. He argues that this decision is crucial for reinstating merit-based politics in the country, emphasising the importance of broader participation in political leadership rather than allowing a select few to wield influence.
In a decisive 5-2 majority ruling, the Supreme Court found merit-based politics used by political parties to elect presidential and parliamentary candidates to be inconsistent with democratic principles. The court has mandated that political parties revise their internal electoral processes within one year, ensuring that all registered members in good standing can actively participate in the candidate selection.
This ruling marks a significant shift from the previous practice, where only a select group of delegates held the power to determine candidate nominations. The court’s directive compels political parties to establish mechanisms that promote wider engagement from their membership base.
Dr. Nyaho-Tamakloe stated, “The Supreme Court’s decision is a commendable step forward for democracy. For democracy to truly thrive, it must be founded on merit. Without that, it loses its essence.” He believes this ruling sends a clear message to political parties regarding the vital need to incorporate the perspectives and choices of ordinary members in their pursuit of political power.
Expressing optimism, the plaintiff urged political parties to embrace the court’s judgment and reform their internal processes to align with democratic values. “I firmly believe that political parties will learn from this. They must recognise that the voice of the people is paramount,” he asserted.
Dr. Nyaho-Tamakloe further emphasised that political positions should be earned based on competence, credibility, and the trust of party members, rather than through financial means or personal connections. “You cannot buy your way into office. Such notions are simply unacceptable,” he added emphatically.
